TRUTH WITH ROUGH EDGES OR POLISHED LIES

                                  

Truth With Rough Edges Or Polished Lies 

If given a choice, I would choose truth with rough edges over polished lies.

A polished lie is a surface without depth. It reflects light perfectly because it has nothing inside to cast a shadow. It is smooth by design ,  sanded down until every contradiction, every risk, every uncomfortable corner is gone. It asks nothing of you except belief. It comforts, it flatters, it fits in your hand. But it cannot bear weight.

Truth with rough edges is different. It is uncut. It carries the marks of how it was made: doubt, failure, revision, time. It snags. It doesn’t fit neatly into conversation. It demands that you hold it carefully, because it might cut. 

Polished lies are about appearance. They exist to be seen, not to be used. They age badly. Under pressure they crack all at once, because there was never any structure beneath the shine.

Rough-edged truth ages differently. It wears, it dulls, it gets handled. Each chip is proof that someone used it to build something. It is not beautiful at first glance, but it is honest about what it is. It does not promise ease. It promises reality.

To choose polish is to choose the comfort of illusion over the labor of understanding.  

To choose rough edges is to choose friction over fantasy, repair over pretense, and a world you can actually stand on over one you can only look at.

Give me the thing that is real, even if it is uneven. I would rather be cut by what is true than be held by what is not.

( Avtar Mota )

CHINAR SHADE by Autarmota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.
Based on a work at http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.

THE DECLINE AND DISAPPEARANCE OF BUDDHISM FROM KASHMIR

                                             

    ( Ruins of  the Buddhist Chaitya at Parihaspora, Kashmir)

The Decline and Disappearance of Buddhism in Kashmir

Kashmir, set like an amphitheatre among the Himalayas, was for more than a thousand years a principal seat of Buddhist civilisation in Asia. Chinese pilgrims, Central Asian merchants and Tibetan scholars all recorded the Valley as a land of monasteries, libraries and debate. It was here, according to tradition, that the Fourth Buddhist Council was convened under Kanishka, and from here that Kashmiri Pandits carried Sanskrit treatises on logic, epistemology and Tantra to Tibet and China and Central Asia . Yet by the end of the fourteenth century this vibrant tradition had all but vanished. The great Viharas were deserted, the Sangha dispersed, and Buddhism ceased to be a public religion in the Valley. The disappearance was not the product of one decisive blow. It was the outcome of political, economic, intellectual and social processes that accumulated over centuries. This essay examines the principal reasons for the decline and ultimate vanishing of Buddhism in Kashmir.

1. Withdrawal of Royal Patronage and Political Instability

The early success of Buddhism in Kashmir rested on continuous state support. The Rajatarangini credits Ashoka with founding Stupas and Viharas, and attributes to the Kushana king Kanishka major councils and endowments. Under the Karkota and Utpala dynasties between the seventh and tenth centuries, kings such as Lalitaditya Muktapida granted land and revenue to monasteries. 

From the eleventh century this pattern reversed. The Lohara kings faced fiscal crisis and internal warfare. Kalhana records that King Harsha confiscated temple and monastery wealth to finance military campaigns. Later rulers increasingly favoured Brahmanical temples because they were tied to the agrarian and caste structure that supported the state. Without tax exemptions, land grants and legal protection, large monastic establishments could not be maintained. The institutional economy of Buddhism collapsed.

2. The Rise of Brahmanical Hinduism and Intellectual Competition

From the Gupta period onwards Kashmir became a leading centre of Brahmanical learning. Shaiva Siddhanta and later the non dual Trika School of Kashmir Shaivism produced a sophisticated theology that addressed the same questions of liberation, consciousness and ritual that Buddhism addressed. Thinkers such as Vasugupta, Abhinavagupta and Kshemaraja wrote works that rivalled Buddhist Pramana literature in rigour.

Buddhism and Hinduism had long coexisted, but Shaivism offered distinct advantages. It did not require monastic celibacy, it integrated local deities and festivals, and it fitted more easily into caste society. Court patronage shifted towards Brahmanical scholars who served as ministers and priests. Lay support followed. Over time, Buddhist intellectuals themselves engaged with Shaiva thought, and some converted.

3. The Incorporation of the Buddha into Hinduism as an Avatar of Vishnu

A crucial ideological factor was of the assimilation  the Buddha into the Hindu fold . From at least the Gupta period, Puranic literature began to list the Buddha as the ninth avatar of Vishnu. This move did not endorse Buddhist doctrine. It reinterpreted the Buddha as a divine teacher who appeared in order to delude the wicked and to restore dharma.

In Kashmir this process had particular force. By presenting the Buddha as part of the Hindu pantheon, Brahmanical authors removed the need for a separate Buddhist community. Lay people could venerate the Buddha in Vishnu temples without supporting the Sangha. Royal inscriptions and temple art began to depict the Buddha alongside other Avatars. Thus Buddhism was not so much refuted as subsumed. The distinct identity of the Buddhist community eroded because its central figure had been incorporated into a larger Hindu framework that commanded state and social support.

4. Tantric Convergence and the Shared Cult of Tara and Other Goddesses

From the seventh century onwards both Buddhism and Hinduism in Kashmir developed strong Tantric traditions. This created a zone of ritual and iconographic overlap that made boundaries porous.The goddess Tara is a key example. In Buddhist Vajrayana, Tara appears as a saviour goddess, consort and meditational deity with multiple forms such as Green Tara and White Tara. At the same time, Tara was also venerated in Hindu Tantric systems as one of the Mahavidyas, a fierce and protective form of the Divine Mother. Kashmiri art and manuscripts show that the same iconographic types circulated in both communities. 

Buddhists in Ladakh and the western Himalayas continued to own Tara and many other goddesses who also belonged to Hindu Tantric worship, such as Vajra Yogini, Kurukulla and Marici. Because the ritual technology, mantras and visual forms were so similar, lay patrons could shift allegiance without abandoning their devotional practices. When royal support for Buddhist monasteries declined, these goddess cults were easily absorbed into local Hindu culture. The shared ownership of Tara and other Tantric deities therefore accelerated assimilation rather than maintaining a distinct Buddhist identity.

5. Economic Decline of Monastic Institutions

Kashmiri monasteries functioned as large economic corporations. They held agricultural land, managed irrigation, and provided education and banking. This model required stability and regular donations. 

From the twelfth century, repeated invasions, crop failure and the diversion of revenue to war undermined this base. The confiscation of monastery lands by both Hindu and later Muslim rulers removed the material foundation of the sangha. Buildings at Parihaspora, Ushkur and Harwan fell into ruin because there were no funds for upkeep. Monks who could not be supported either migrated to Ladakh and Tibet or returned to lay life. Once the institutional chain was broken, it could not be repaired.

6.The Perceived Inadequacy of Ahimsa in the Face of Recurring Invasion

A further reason lies in the political implications of Buddhist ethics. The doctrine of ahimsa and the monastic ideal of non involvement in warfare gave Buddhism great moral authority, but it also limited its capacity to act as a state ideology. 

Kashmir suffered a series of invasions and internal conflicts between the tenth and fourteenth centuries. During these crises, ruling elites sought religious traditions that could legitimise kingship and military defence. Brahmanical Hinduism, with its concepts of kshatriya dharma and divine kingship, and later Islam, with its framework of political law, were better suited to this role. Buddhist sources themselves record a sense that the Sangha could not protect the kingdom. In such a context, the doctrine of non violence came to be seen by sections of the ruling class as inadequate for statecraft. Patronage therefore shifted to traditions that could sanctify the army and the administration. This perception accelerated the marginalisation of Buddhism at the very moment when political support was most needed.

7 The Expansion of Islam and the New Religious Order

The establishment of Muslim rule under the Shah Mir dynasty in 1339 marked a decisive turning point. Muslim missionaries, traders and scholars entered the Valley from Persia and Central Asia. Islam offered a new social and spiritual framework. 

Conversion to the new faith was done under missionary zeal and was most marked among artisans, cultivators and sections of the administration. Muslim rulers altered the fiscal system and repurposed many Hindu or Buddhist religious buildings. The process of conversion became aggressive during the rule of Shahmiri Sultans . Some Sultans gained notoriety for demolishing Temples and suppressing the Hindus. By the time of Sultan Zain ul Abidin in the fifteenth century, Buddhism had effectively disappeared from the Valley. Unlike Ladakh, Kashmir had no surviving Buddhist polity to shelter the community. Over two or three generations, Buddhist families converted or migrated.

8.Doctrinal Developments and the Loss of Trans regional Networks

Internally, Kashmiri Buddhism had become increasingly esoteric and dependent on initiated lineages. When teachers died or left during periods of instability, lineages were broken and texts were lost. 

Externally, Kashmir’s strength had been its connectivity. Kashmiri monks taught in Khotan, Dunhuang and Tibet, and Tibetan translators depended on Kashmiri pandits until the twelfth century. As Central Asia converted to Islam and trade routes shifted, this network contracted. Tibet developed its own monastic centres and no longer relied on Kashmir. When local support in the Valley collapsed, there was no wider Buddhist world to replenish monks or manuscripts.

Conclusion

The disappearance of Buddhism from Kashmir was the result of converging pressures. Royal patronage moved first to Hinduism and then to Islam. Brahmanical thought offered a compelling intellectual alternative and, through the avatar doctrine, absorbed the Buddha into its own framework. The shared Tantric cult of Tara and other goddesses meant that Buddhist devotional life could be continued within Hindu worship, so that distinct institutions were no longer necessary. The economic base of monasteries was destroyed by war and confiscation. The ethical emphasis on ahimsa, while central to Buddhist identity, was perceived as ill suited to the demands of a state facing invasion. Finally, the spread of Islam through conversions changed the socio- political landscape of the Kashmir Valley .

What remains today are ruins, manuscripts and Tibetan translations of works composed in Kashmir. The history of Buddhism in the Valley illustrates that religious traditions endure not by doctrine alone, but by the political, economic and cultural structures that sustain them. When those structures changed, the lotus of Kashmir Buddhism closed.

( Avtar Mota )

Bibliography

(1)Basham, A. L. The Wonder That Was India. London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1954.

(2) Dutt, Sukumar. Buddhist Monks and Monasteries of India. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1962.

(3)Kak, Ram Chandra. Ancient Monuments of Kashmir. London: India Society, 1933.

(4) Kalhana. Rajatarangini: The Saga of the Kings of Kashmir. Translated by R. S. Pandit. Allahabad: Indian Press, 1935.

(5) Snellgrove, David. Indo Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Shambhala, 1987.

(6) Stein, M. A. Kalhana’s Rajatarangini: A Chronicle of the Kings of Kashmir. 2 vols. Westminster: Archibald Constable, 1900.

(7) Tansen, Sen. Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of Sino Indian Relations, 600–1400. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2003.

CHINAR SHADE by Autarmota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.

Based on a work at http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.

ON WITHDRAWING FROM THE EROSIVE

                                         

                        

On Withdrawing from the Erosive

There arrives a point at which patience ceases to be forbearance and becomes self-diminishment . When the soul has sustained repeated lacerations :  from coarse speech, fits of temper, and the arrogance of imposition , it recognises a higher law. The law of preservation. 

To keep such people at bay is not pride.It is hygiene of the spirit. The Stoics termed this 'prohairesis' : the faculty of moral choice.We do not control other men, but we do control the door through which they enter us. As Marcus Aurelius observed:  

"You have power over your mind :  not outside events. Realise this, and you will find strength."

 

(Source: Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations": IV.3)

Nature anticipates this wisdom. Every living being inclines toward the next day’s light. The plant turns its leaves. The animal withdraws to its den. The human being must also withdraw, not from the world, but from what poisons it. And he must do so not from rancour, but from lucidity.

This is  Apavāda, the Vedic discipline of negation. Not through hatred, nor through retribution, but through discernment. One does not dispute with fire in the hope of cooling it. One steps aside, so as to remain capable of warmth for those who are  worthy of it.

Distance thus assumes the character of a sacrament: a deliberate refusal to barter one’s clarity for another’s disorder. It is the conservation of the self. That when dawn arrives, one is not diminished, not seared, not hollowed.  That the sun may find one entire.

Avtar Mota)

Postscript  

Marcus Aurelius, Roman Emperor from 161 to 180 AD, was a Stoic philosopher. Amid war and plague he composed private reflections intended for self-correction. These were later compiled as Meditations. Posterity remembers him as the philosopher-king, a ruler who sought to govern with reason, duty, and restraint whilst wielding absolute power.

CHINAR SHADE by Autarmota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.
Based on a work at http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.

KABIR :THE WEAVER WHO SET FIRE TO THE BAZAAR

                                          

Kabir: The Weaver Who Set Fire to the Bazaar

Kabir, the 15th-century mystic-weaver of Varanasi, occupies a singular place in Indian intellectual history. He was not a monk in a monastery, nor a court poet pandering to power. He stood, as his own verse declares, in the marketplace:

"Kabira khada bazaar mein, liye lukaati haath.  

Jo ghar phoonke aapna, chale hamare saath."

(Kabir stands in the marketplace, with a torch in hand.  

Whoever is ready to burn their own house down, let them come with me.)

This is not a call to arson. It is an epistemological and ethical provocation. The Bazaar is Samsara, the world of trade, gossip, creed, and transaction. The Lukaati, the torch, is Viveka, discriminative awareness. And to "burn one's house" is to incinerate : Ahankara, social identity, and inherited dogma. Kabir demands a total rupture before discipleship can begin. The house or the structure built over falsehood  must go first.  

The Rebel Epistemology  

Kabir’s rebellion was threefold, and therein lies his modernity.  

First: Theological Rebellion

In his verses, Kabir criticised fake Pandits  and illiterate Molvis, as well as the ritualism and orthodoxy embedded in religious practices. He called the merchants of religion  out for empty ritual, hypocrisy, and using religion to control people. He exposed those who preached one thing and lived another :  full of ego, anger, and greed.  

For Kabir, God was Nirguna ;  without attributes, without temple, without mosque. Direct experience, not middlemen.

"Maala pherat jug  bhaya,  

Gaya na mun ka pher.  

Kar ka manka chhaad de,  

Mun ka manka pher."_

" Centuries  passed by turning the rosary beads,   

but the mind never turned.  

So , better drop the beads in hand,  

And turn the beads of the mind." 

"Paahan pooje hari mile, to main poojun pahar.  

Taa se to chakki bhali, pees khaaye sansaar."

(If worshipping a stone

 could bring you to God,

 I would worship a mountain.  

Better worship the millstone, 

which grinds and feeds the world.)

"Kankar pathar jod ke, masjid liye banaye.  

Ta chadh mulla baang de, kya behra bhayo Khuday."

(Joining stones you built a mosque.  

The mullah climbs up and calls the azaan.  

Has God gone deaf?) 

"Mala to kar mein phire, jeebh phire mukh maahi.  

Manwa to chahun dishi phire, yah to sumiran naahi."

(The rosary beads move in your hand, and your tongue moves in your mouth.  

But your mind wanders in all directions — this is not true prayer.)

Second: Social Rebellion

Born into a weaver family, Kabir lived the dignity of labour and scorned caste hierarchy five centuries before it entered constitutional discourse.

"Jaati na poochho sadhu ki, pooch leejiye gyaan.  

Mol karo talvaar ka, pada rahan do miyaan."

(Do not ask a saint’s caste. Ask for his knowledge.  

Value the sword, leave the scabbard.)

Third: Psychological Rebellion

He located the divine within, not in pilgrimage or external display. This is why Kabir could not be claimed by any one camp.

"Na teerath mein na moorat mein na kaaba Kailaas mein,  

Mo ko kahaan doonde re bandhe, main to tere paas mein."

(Not in pilgrimage, not in the idol, not in Kaaba or Kailasha peak.  

Why are you searching for me everywhere, O seeker? I am right beside you.)

Kabir stood firmly against animal slaughter in every form. He condemned the knife and the ritual, saying no life is too small to be taken in the name of God, tradition, or appetite. For him, true worship was compassion, not blood, and any prayer that demanded blood was false.

"Kabira teri Jhonpri

gal katiyan Ke paas

Jag karni sabu hi ne bharni

Tu kyon bhayo udaas."

(O Kabir!

Your hut stands beside the butchers’ lane.

Each bears the weight of their own deeds.

Then why do you grieve?)

Kabir was truly secular, but not "politically correct" ;and that’s why his words still sting 600 years later. He didn’t pick sides. He rejected religious  orthodoxy and exploitation coming from any quarter . He sang of Ram and Rahim, but meant the same formless truth. He wrote not to please anyone, but because he’d experienced it.  He didn’t say "Hindus are bad" or "Muslims are bad." He said: religious  leaders who use religion for power, ego, and fake rituals are frauds.  He was inclusive in spirit but brutal about fake devotion. That’s why both money minded  Pandits and  Molvis were uncomfortable with him, and why common people loved him.

The Brahmagyani Weaver of Ramanand’s Lineage

Kabir represents a singular synthesis in Indian thought: a   Brahmagyani weaver trained by Sant Ramananda of Varanasi , who internalised the full Vedantic-Yogic architecture and then deliberately transposed it into the language of the Bazaar. Ramananda , a Brahmin by birth, was the pioneer of the Bhakti movement in North India, founder of the Ramanandi Sampradaya, and a social reformer who taught in Hindi and initiated disciples irrespective of caste, creed or birth ,  including Kabir the weaver, Ravidas the cobbler, Sena the barber, Bhagat Pipa and others. He drew from Ramanuja’s Vishishtadvaita and Nathpanthi yoga, and is credited as “the bridge between the Bhakti movement of the South and the North”.

From this Guru , Kabir received  Brahmavidya. He was not anti-scripture but totally against ritual orthodoxy  possessing direct knowledge of Atman-Brahman, Turiya, Ingla-Pingla-Sushumna, Kundalini, and Anhad Naad, yet refusing to confine it to Ashram . Central to his praxis was the power of Naam Japa,  not mechanical repetition, but Surat, fixed on  Ramas the formless, Nirguna truth, the thread that holds the loom of existence together. His philosophical tools , Viveka as the torch of discrimination, ,Chakki as centered praxis between the millstones of duality, and Anhad Naada as interior audition , operationalise metaphysics within daily labour. Thus  his lines “Hamaare guru mile brahmgyani”  is an epistemic claim : from Ramananda he received the map, and from the loom he forged a method where  Karma, Jnana, Yoga, and Naam Japa converge. In an era of ritual orthodoxy and social hierarchy, Kabir’s contribution was to democratise the highest knowledge without diluting it, making  Turiya and Atman accessible to the person at the shuttle through work, awareness, and remembrance.

Kabir Vani in Sri Guru Granth Sahib

Guru Arjan Dev was profoundly impressed by Kabir Vani and accorded it a place of great eminence in the Adi Granth, compiled in 1604 at Amritsar. In all, 541 hymns of Bhagat Kabir were included, comprising  227 Padas set to 17 Ragas and  237 slokas. This is the largest contribution by any Bhagat in the Guru Granth Sahib.  Guru Arjan Dev did not merely collect these verses; he arranged them by Raga, preserving their musical and meditative structure so that they could be sung in a spiritual gathering. By placing Kabir’s Vani in the Adi Granth , Guru Arjan Dev made a decisive theological statement: "Truth is not confined to institution, lineage or social status" . In doing so, he elevated Kabir Vani as a living scripture of inner experience, accessible to all, and ensured that the voice of the weaver-saint would resonate within Sikh worship for centuries to come.

Foreign Scholarship on Kabir

Kabir’s appeal has long crossed civilisational boundaries because he speaks in the register of universal ethics rather than sectarian theology.  

(1) 

Rabindranath Tagore translated 100 of Kabir’s songs, called him “the greatest of the religious poets of India” and noted that Kabir l“speaks with that voice of authority which belongs to the prophets.” Tagore saw in him a directness that bypassed scripture: “He is the man of the people... his language is as simple as his life.”

(2)

Evelyn Underhill ,the British scholar of mysticism, wrote in her introduction to Tagore’s 'One Hundred Poems of Kabir' that Kabir was  “a great poet and a great religious teacher” whose work represents “one of the most remarkable products of the religious consciousness of the East.”She argued his poems achieve “a metaphysic which is at once intensely practical and intensely spiritual.”

(3)

Robert N. Minor , the  American philosopher, observes that Kabir “deconstructs the social and religious edifices of his time not to destroy society, but to reconstruct it on the basis of direct experience.” Minor places Kabir within a global prophetic tradition alongside Socrates and Whitman for his insistence on conscience over institution.  

(4)

Charlotte Vaudeville,  the French scholar, described Kabir as  “the voice of the urban poor, the artisan, the man who had no place in the social order,”and credited him with forging a new lingua franca of spirituality in early Hindavi that could be understood across communities.  

Conclusion

Kabir is not comfortable. That is the point. To walk with him is to consent to have one’s house burned ; the house of prejudice, of performative piety, of social rank. He offers no institution in return, only a torch and a road through the bazaar.  

In an age of curated identities and algorithmic echo chambers, Kabir’s 15th-century demand feels almost contemporary: strip away, look inward, speak plainly, and work honestly. As Tagore put it, he is “the great denier”and because he denied so much, what he affirmed, love, labour, and truth, endures.  

Kabir’s legacy is not confined to poetry anthologies or devotional singing. It is a living ethic. He reminds us that social reform begins not in parliament or pulpit, but in the courage to question one’s own certainties. To carry Kabir’s torch today is to reject divisive and myopic social vision, to honour labour over lineage, and to speak truth even when the Bazaar demands silence. 

In that sense, Kabir is not a figure of the past. He is a perpetual dissident, standing in every age’s marketplace, asking the same unsettling question: who among us is ready to burn the house down and walk? Kabir  stands in the Absurd Bazaar and refuses to lie about it . Philosophically, he  is the Albert Camus that India direly needs in its march to the  21st century. 

(Avtar Mota)

CHINAR SHADE by Autarmota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.

Based on a work at http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.

THE LAST JOURNEY OF ALBERT CAMUS

                                   

                      ( A Simple Grave inside Lourmarin Cemetery)

                                                                  (L to R .. Prof Jean Grenier , Camus's widow and  Gallimard)

                                                                        ( The Pallbearers )

The Last Journey Of Albert Camus

"You didn’t even try to know what I am,  

Listen, my friend ; 

Loving me was never meant to be easy.

I don’t want ceremonies. 

I don’t want customs.

I want a love that’s empty, 

Quiet, 

And real.

Your gold,

Your sky, 

Your riches ; 

All of it is dust to me.

Trembling lips.

One whisper of faith.

One heart that won’t stop beating. 

One tear that refuses to fall.

That’s it.

That’s all I own. 

These are my pearls,

My diamonds,

My entire world.

Loving me was never meant to be easy, 

My friend."...( Ali Sardar Jafri)

On 6 January 1960, the village of Lourmarin in the Luberon ( France ) received back the man it had adopted. Three days earlier, Albert Camus had died instantly in a car crash at Villeblin, near Sens. The car was driven by his publisher and friend, Michel Gallimard. Michel would die a few days later. True to Camus’s own wishes, there was no state funeral, no lying-in-state in Paris, no national eulogy. Instead, the burial was arranged quickly, quietly, and privately in the Provençal cemetery where Camus had bought a house four years before, drawn there by his old teacher Jean Grenier. 

About thirty to forty people gathered in the winter light. Family came first: Francine Camus in black, veiled, with their twelve-year-old twins, Catherine and Jean. Around them stood the small circle that had shaped Camus’s life and work. There were no speeches at the graveside. The priest said a brief service. The only sounds were wind in the olive trees and footsteps on gravel.

The coffin itself was plain pine, without ornament or insignia. Six men carried it from the hearse to the grave. They were Gaston Gallimard, the publisher who had brought Camus to Gallimard in 1942 and stood by him through every controversy; Robert Gallimard, Michel’s brother, bearing the double grief of the crash; René Char, poet and Resistance comrade, who had hidden and fought with Camus in the south; Louis Guilloux, the novelist who had encouraged Camus’s early writing; and two men from Lourmarin who stepped forward from the village to help bear one of their own. 

They walked a short distance through streets Camus knew well, past the house where he wrote, past the café where he watched local football. At the cemetery, the coffin was lowered into earth already familiar with sun and drought. Grass and wild herbs grew around the stone. Visitors would later leave pebbles, notes, and metro tickets, but that day there was only restraint.

The modesty of the cortège was deliberate. It reflected Camus’s distaste for spectacle and his love for this “solemn and austere” landscape. He was returned to the earth not as a Nobel laureate, but as a neighbour, carried to his rest by friends, editors, and the village that had become his home.The players from the village football team joined all. Camus had gifted them T shirts and patronised them affectionately. Camus's teacher , guide and friend Prof Jean Grenier was at Sorbonne . He was shocked . He also joined the  funeral . Grenier wrote this :

“He prevented me from being a humanist in the sense that it is understood today ; I mean a man blinded by narrow certainties. Albert had followed me to Lourmarin. He wrote to me: ‘I am following in your footsteps.’ And then, suddenly, he was gone.”(Source: Albert Camus: Souvenirs, Editions  Gallimard, Publishers, Paris  1968) .

And Camus had repeatedly expressed his gratitude to Prof Jean Grenier, his philosophy teacher at the University of Algiers. In a letter to Prof Grenier, Camus wrote this:

" J’ai eu la chance d’avoir un maître. Il s’appelait Jean Grenier. Votre livre Les Îles m’a donné à la fois un terrain de réflexion et une forme. C’est à vous que je dois le plus essentiel.Je vous dois presque tout, et presque tout ce que j’ai écrit vous le doit aussi. "

 " I was lucky to have a teacher. His name was Jean Grenier. Your book 'Les Îles' gave me both a terrain for reflection and a form. It is to you that I owe the most essential.I owe you almost everything, and almost everything that I have written also owes it to you."

 

( Avtar Mota )

PS

(1)

In another letter to Prof Jean Grenier, Camus wrote this in the concluding paragraph:

"Sometimes it seems I no longer have anything to say to anyone except to you (and to my mother, with whom I never speak, of course). And in everything I intend to do, I would be at quite a loss if I could not turn to you. Write to me in spite of my silence....To you and yours, very affectionately.".... Albert Camus

(2)

When Albert Camus published L'Envers et l'Endroit in 1937 and dedicated it to his teacher Jean Grenier, people in Algiers began calling Camus "Grenier's disciple." Grenier rejected the label, telling Camus that the work mattered more than any pedestal. He was also a steady presence in Camus's personal life: when Camus confessed his infidelities and struggles, Grenier listened without judgment instead of moralising. Camus later wrote that he owed Grenier the same "upright heart" his wife Francine had shown him: quiet honesty, loyalty, and support without lectures.

(3)

Jean Grenier loved Albert Camus with a profound, paternal and intellectual devotion. Grenier was Camus’ philosophy teacher at the Lycée in Algiers in 1929, and became his lifelong mentor and friend. Camus dedicated L’Envers et l’Endroit to him and called him “mon maître”, while Grenier, after Camus’ death in 1960, devoted the rest of his life to preserving his memory in books like ; Albert Camus: Souvenirs. What made their bond unusual was its Eastern inflection: Grenier introduced young Camus not only to Greek thought but also to the Eastern thought ;to the Bhagavad Gita, Buddhist detachment, and Laozi’s Tao , which shaped Camus’ ideas of living without illusions yet with dignity, of accepting the absurd without despair. It was a classical bond of master and disciple: Grenier gave Camus philosophy, the Mediterranean sun, and an Eastern sense of inner stillness, and Camus gave Grenier’s ideas a voice the world would hear.

(4)

Grenier taught the Greek "measure" and the Gita's "nishkama action" to Camus.Camus adopted this as a Mediterranean alternative to European abstraction. Grenier taught Camus that happiness was not in conquering, but in limiting oneself. That became Camus’s lifelong stance: neither victim nor executioner, neither saint nor revolutionary.

(a)

"La mesure est la vertu des dieux et des hommes heureux.”

“Measure is the virtue of the gods and of happy men.”

(b)

"Agir sans espoir et sans désespoir.”

“To act without hope and without despair.”

(5)

Without Grenier, there would be no Meursault walking on the beach, and no Sisyphus smiling at his rock. Grenier gave Camus permission to write from Algiers, from the body, and from limits. He taught him that philosophy could be lyrical, that ethics could be modest, and that freedom lay in saying yes to the world as it is. As Camus put it nearly twenty years after first reading his teacher: the phrases stayed with him, because the life behind them did.

CHINAR SHADE by Autarmota is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.

Based on a work at http:\\autarmota.blogspot.com\.